Tamsioji materija: „paslėptoji masė“

Dark matter: "Hidden mass"

Evidence from galactic rotation curves, gravitational lensing, WIMPs, axon theories, holographic interpretations, and even extreme simulation ideas


The invisible "framework" of the Universe

When observing stars in a galaxy or measuring the brightness of visible matter, it becomes clear that this visible part only constitutes a small part of that galaxy. gravitational masses part. Starting spiral curves of rotation and swarm collisions (e.g., a bullet cluster) and ending with cosmic microwave background (KMF) anisotropies and large structures studies, all data indicate that there is dark matter (DM), which is approximately five times exceeds the visible mass. Invisible matter cannot be easily detected electromagnetically (either by emitting or absorbing light), its presence is only revealed by gravitational impact.

In the Standard (ΛCDM) model of cosmology dark matter is about 85% all matter, decisively affects the cosmic web and stabilizes the structure of galaxies. The prevailing theory for decades is based on with new particles (WIMPs, axons) as prime candidates, but direct search has not yet given final confirmation, so some scientists are looking for alternative paths: modified gravity or even more radicals frameworks. Some suggest that TM may be emergent or holographic origin, and others, even further, even say that we may be living in simulation or in the context of a cosmic experiment, where "dark matter" is only a result of the future. All these extreme hypotheses, although far from the mainstream, show how unfinished the TM problem is and encourage openness to new ideas in the pursuit of the ultimate cosmic truth.


2. Abundant evidence for dark matter

2.1 Galactic rotation curves

One of the early direct indicators of dark matter is rotation curves of spiral galaxies. The logic of Newton's laws would require that the orbital velocity of stars far from the galactic center v(r) ∝ 1/√r should decrease if most of the mass is in the stellar disk. However Vera Rubin with colleagues in the 1970s showed that external areas rotates at an almost constant speed, which indicates a huge invisible halo, many times more massive than the mass of visible stars and gas [1,2].

2.2 Gravitational lensing and the Bullet Cluster

Gravitational lensing – the bending of light in the spacetime curvature created by massive objects – provides another reliable measure of mass, whether it radiates or not. Observations of galaxy clusters, especially the famous Bullet swarm (1E 0657–56), it can be seen that the total mass calculated from lensing does not agree with the distribution of bright gas (where the large baryonic mass is concentrated). This indicates that when swarms collide, the dark matter "passed through" without interacting or shrinking, while the gas collided and slowed down. Such bright the example is not explained by baryons alone or by a simple gravitational correction [3].

2.3 Arguments for the cosmic microwave background and large-scale structures

Cosmic microwave background (KMF) data (COBE, WMAP, Planck, etc.) reveal a temperature spectrum with acoustic peaks. They are best suited for a baryonic matter that constitutes only a small fraction of all matter, and ~85% non-baryonic dark matter. Meanwhile large structures formation requires cold (almost non-interacting) DM, which began to accumulate early in gravitational wells, attracting baryons and forming galaxies. Without such a DM component, galaxies would not have formed so early and in the order we see.


3. Prevailing particle theories: WIMPs and axons

3.1 WIMP (Weakly Interacting Massive Particle)

For many years WIMP was the prime candidate for the TM. With masses in the ~GeV–TeV range and (weak) interactions, they would naturally yield a residual (relative) abundance close to the observed TM mass, called the “WIMP miracle". However direct measurements (XENON, LZ, PandaX, etc.) and accelerators (LHC) studies have severely limited simple WIMP models, as no clear signals have been found [4,5]. Nevertheless, the WIMP hypothesis has not yet been written off, but it has become significantly less likely.

3.2 Axons

Axons proposed as part of the Peccei–Quinn mechanism (to solve the strong CP problem), they were expected to be very light (< meV) pseudoscalars. They may form cosmic Bose–Einstein condensates, acting as "cold" TMs. Experiments such as ADMX or HAYSTAC are searching for axon–photon transitions in resonant cavities in strong magnetic fields. No conclusive results have been found yet, but many mass ranges remain unexplored. Axons may also affect the cooling of stars, providing additional constraints. Variants of "fuzzy DM" help to address small-scale structural oddities by introducing quantum pressure in haloes.

3.3 Other candidate spectrum

Sterile neutrinos (like "warm" TM), dark photons, mirror worlds or various "dark sectors" are also being considered. Each must meet the requirements of relativistic abundance, structure formation, direct/indirect measurements. While WIMPs and axons dominate, these "exotic" ideas show how much imagination is needed for new physics to connect the Standard Model with the "dark sector."


4. The Holographic Universe and the Idea of ​​“Dark Matter as a Projection”

4.1 Holographic principle

In 1990, Gerard 't Hooft and Leonard Susskind proposed holographic principlethat spatial degrees of freedom volume can be encoded on a lower-dimensional surface, much like the information of a 3D object fits on a 2D plane. In some quantum gravity In the paradigms (AdS/CFT), the gravitational “core” is represented by the limiting CFT. Some explain this by saying that the “internal reality” is formed from external data [6].

4.2 Does dark matter arise from holographic effects?

In standard cosmology, dark matter is understood as substance with gravitational effects. However, there is a speculative idea that the visible "hidden mass" could be some kind of "informative" a consequence of the holographic properties. In these theories:

  • We measure the effects of "dark mass" on rotation curves or lensing, which may arise due to information-based geometry.
  • Some, for example, Verlinde's emergent gravity, attempts to explain dark matter by replacing gravitational fields on large scales, based on entropic and holographic reasoning.

This interpretation of "holographic TM" is not yet as complete as ΛCDM, and it is more difficult for it to accurately reproduce the data on cluster lensing or cosmic structures. For now, it remains a field of theoretical work, combining the concepts of quantum gravity and cosmic expansion. It is possible that future breakthroughs will combine these ideas with conventional TM theory, or perhaps show their incompatibility.

4.3 Maybe we are a "cosmic projection"?

An even more extreme idea: our entire world is "simulation" or "projection", where dark matter is a kind of side effect of encoding/representation. Such a hypothesis approaches philosophy (similar to the idea of ​​simulation).We don't yet see any testable mechanisms that explain the structure of the TM in the same way that standard cosmology does. But it reminds us that until we have a definitive answer, it's useful to think outside the box.


5. Are we an artificial simulation or an experiment?

5.1 The simulation argument

Philosophers and technology enthusiasts (such as Nick Bostrom) suggest that highly advanced civilizations could run massive simulations of the universe or society. If so, we humans could be virtual characters on a computer. In this case, dark matter may have been "corrupted" as a kind of gravitational basis for galaxies. Perhaps the creators intentionally created such a TM distribution to form interesting structures or conditions for life.

5.2 Galactic school experiment?

We could imagine that we are laboratory test in some alien kid's space class, where the teacher's textbook says: "Create stability for galaxies by adding an invisible halo." This is a very hypothetical and untested idea that crosses the scientific line. It suggests that if dark matter is still unexplained, it is possible (very speculatively) to include such "artificial" perspectives.

5.3 Synergy of Mystery and Creativity

There are no observations to prove these scenarios, but they show how far one can deviate if TSM remains undetected. From this we understand that for now dark matter is a more material thing in our physics framework. But let's admit, imaginary models about simulations or "artificial" TM stimulate the imagination and prevent us from becoming stuck in a single theoretical framework.


6. Modified gravity vs. real dark matter

Although the prevailing view is that dark matter – this is a new material, another theoretical current emphasizes modified gravity (MOND, TeVeS, emergent gravity, etc.). Bullet swarm, fusion rates, and KMF data are strong arguments for the existence of real dark matter, although some extensions of MOND attempt to circumvent these challenges. To date, ΛCDM remains more consistent with DM on different scales.


7. The Search for Dark Matter: The Present and the Coming Decade

7.1 Direct detection

  • XENONnT, LZ, PandaX: Multi-ton xenon detectors aim to capture WIMP-nucleon interactions down to about 10-46 cm2 boundaries.
  • SuperCDMS, EDELWEISS: Cryogenic semiconductors (better for low WIMP masses).
  • Axon "haloscopes" (ADMX, HAYSTAC) searches for axon-photon interactions in resonators.

7.2 Indirect detection

  • Gamma telescopes (Fermi-LAT, HESS, CTA) are searching for traces of annihilation in the Galactic Center, in dwarf galaxies.
  • Cosmic rays research (AMS-02) is looking for larger amounts of positrons and antiprotons from the TM.
  • Neutrino detectors can detect neutrinos if TMs accumulate in the cores of the Sun or Earth.

7.3 Accelerator research

LHC (CERN) and other future accelerators are searching for events with lost transverse energy (signals of "monojets") or new particles that could be TM intermediates. There is no clear evidence, but upcoming upgrades to the LHC and possible 100 TeV accelerators (FCC) may expand the range of investigations.


8. Open approach: standard models + speculation

So far, direct/invisible searches have not yielded a definite result, so experts remain open to various possibilities:

  1. Classic TM models: WIMPs, axons, sterile neutrinos, etc.
  2. Modified gravity: emergent gravity, MOND variations.
  3. Holographic Universe: perhaps TM phenomena are some kind of projections of finite degrees of freedom.
  4. Simulation hypothesis: perhaps cosmic reality is a simulation of an advanced civilization, and "dark matter" is a product of code.
  5. Alien Children Science Experiment: absurd, but shows that unproven things can be perceived in different ways.

Most scientists still rely more on the existence of a real TM, but extreme ignorance gives rise to various conceptual attempts that help maintain creativity until we get a final answer.


9. Conclusion

Dark matter is a huge mystery: abundant observations leaves no doubt that there is a significant mass component that cannot be explained by visible matter or baryons alone. Most theories are based on particulate The nature of TMs – WIMPs, axons or the secret sector – is being tested in detectors, cosmic rays and accelerators. Since there is no definitive evidence yet, the model space is expanding and the instruments are becoming more sophisticated.

At the same time there is radicals thoughts – holographic, "emergent" or even simulation scenarios - which suggest that TM may be even more puzzling or emerge from a deeper space-time whether information nature. Perhaps one day a special discovery—a new particle or some amazing correction to gravity—will solve everything. For now, the identity of dark matter is a fundamental challenge in astrophysics and particle physics. Whether we discover a fundamental particle or something radical about it, spaces and time structure, the path to the mystery of this "hidden mass" and to the answer to what our role is in the galactic fabric (real or imagined) remains open.


References and further reading

  1. Rubin, V. C., & Ford, W. K. (1970). "Rotation of the Andromeda Nebula from a spectroscopic survey of emission regions." The Astrophysical Journal, 159, 379–403.
  2. Bosma, A. (1981). "21-cm line studies of spiral galaxies. I. The rotation curves of nine galaxies." Astronomy & Astrophysics, 93, 106–112.
  3. Clowe, D., et al. (2006). "A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter." The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 648, L109–L113.
  4. Bertone, G., Hooper, D., & Silk, J. (2005). "Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints." Physics Reports, 405, 279–390.
  5. Feng, J. L. (2010). "Dark Matter Candidates from Particle Physics and Methods of Detection." Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 48, 495–545.
  6. Susskind, L. (1995). "The world as a hologram." Journal of Mathematical Physics, 36, 6377–6396.
Return to the blog