Genetiniai Polinkiai - www.Kristalai.eu

Genetic inclinations

Understanding the Origin of Intelligence has long been a subject of fascination and research. The interaction between genetics and environment that shapes cognitive abilities is complex and multidimensional. This article examines the role of heredity in intelligence, delving into genetic contributions to cognitive abilities and exploring insights from twin and adopted child studies that shed light on the nature versus nurture debate.

The Role of Heredity in Intelligence: Genetic Contributions to Cognitive Abilities

Genetic Influence on Intelligence

Intelligence is a highly heritable trait, with genetics playing a significant role in individual differences in cognitive abilities.

Heritability Estimates

  • Heritability Coefficients: Studies estimate that about 50%–80% of the variation in intelligence between individuals can be attributed to genetic factors.
  • Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS): GWAS has identified numerous genetic variants associated with intelligence, although each has a small effect size.

The Polygenic Nature of Intelligence

  • Many Genes Are Involved: Intelligence is polygenic, meaning it is influenced by many genes, each of which has a small effect.
  • Gene Interactions: Interactions between different genes can affect cognitive outcomes, adding complexity to genetic predictions.

Specific Genetic Factors

  • Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs):
    • Genetic Variants: Certain SNPs have been associated with cognitive performance, although findings are often inconsistent.
  • Educational Achievement Genes: Some genes associated with educational achievement correlate with measures of intelligence.

Neurobiological Pathways

  • Neurotransmitter Systems: Genes that affect dopamine and serotonin pathways can influence cognitive functions such as memory and attention.
  • Brain Structure and Function: Genetic factors contribute to the development of brain regions associated with intelligence, such as the prefrontal cortex.

Gene-Environment Interactions

  • Environmental Moderation:
    • Socio-Economic Status (SES): The expression of genetic potential for intelligence may be moderated by SES, with greater heritability observed in more advantaged environments.
    • Educational Opportunities: Access to education can enhance or suppress genetic potential for intelligence.
  • Epigenetics:
    • Gene Expression Changes: Environmental factors can induce epigenetic modifications that affect the expression of genes associated with cognitive abilities.
    • Transgenerational Effects: Some epigenetic changes can be passed on, influencing intelligence across generations.

Understanding genetic contributions to intelligence emphasizes the important role of heredity, while recognizing the influence of environmental factors.

Twin and Adopted Child Studies: Insights into Nature vs. Nurture

Studies of twins and adopted children provide valuable methodologies for revealing the influence of genetics and environment on intelligence.

Twin Studios

  • Monozygotic vs. Dizygotic Twins:
    • Monozygotic (Identical) Twins: Shares almost 100% of their genes.
    • Dizygotic (Fraternal) Twins: About 50% of segregating genes are shared.
  • Conclusions from Twin Studies:
    • Highest Correlation Level for Identical Twins: Identical twins show more similar intelligence scores than fraternal twins, supporting a genetic influence.
    • Heritability Estimates: Twin studies estimate the heritability of intelligence as significant, often around 50% or more.
  • General vs. Non-General Environment:
    • General Environment: Factors that twins share, such as family environment.
    • General Environment: Unique experiences that contribute to differences even between identical twins.

Adopted Children Studies

  • Genetic vs. Environmental Influence:
    • Adopted Children and Biological Parents: Resemblance to biological parents indicates genetic influence.
    • Adopted Children and Adoptive Parents: The resemblance to adoptive parents indicates environmental influence.
  • Findings from the Adopted Children Study:
    • Adopted Brothers and Sisters: Shows lower correlation in intelligence scores than biological siblings, emphasizing genetic factors.
    • Environmental Impact: Adoption into higher SES families may lead to higher intelligence scores, demonstrating environmental effects.

Combined Twin and Adopted Children Studies

  • Studies of Separated Twins:
    • Identical Separated Twins: Provides a unique opportunity to assess genetic influence independently of the general environment.
    • Conclusions: These twins show significant similarity in intelligence, reinforcing the importance of a genetic role.

The Nature vs. Nurture Debate

Interactionist Approach

  • Gene-Environment Interaction: Both genetics and environment contribute significantly to intelligence.
  • Climate Change: The relative influence of genetics and environment can change over the lifespan.

Impact on Education and Politics

  • Personalized Education: Recognizing individual genetic potentials can inform tailored educational approaches.
  • Environmental Enrichment: Improving environmental factors can help maximize cognitive development, regardless of genetic basis.

Studies of twins and adopted children provide compelling evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence, while also highlighting the critically important role of environmental factors.

The study of genetic predispositions to intelligence reveals a complex interplay between heredity and environment. Genetic factors contribute significantly to cognitive abilities, with many genes acting through multiple neurobiological pathways. Studies of twins and adopted children have been important in quantifying the genetic and environmental contributions, providing valuable insights into the nature versus nurture debate.

The understanding that intelligence is shaped by both genetics and environment emphasizes the importance of providing rich environments to foster cognitive development. Recognizing individual differences and promoting equal learning opportunities can help maximize intellectual potential across diverse populations.

As research advances, ethical issues related to genetic information and its application in education and society are becoming increasingly important.Balancing knowledge of genetic influences with a commitment to social justice remains a critical challenge for the future.

Literature

  1. Plomin, R., & Deary, IJ (2015). Genetics and intelligence differences: Five special findings. Molecular Psychiatry, 20(1), 98-108.
  2. Savage, JE, et al. (2018). Genome-wide association meta-analysis in 269,867 individuals identifies new genetic and functional links to intelligence. Nature Genetics, 50(7), 912-919.
  3. Davies, G., et al. (2011). Genome-wide association studies establish that human intelligence is highly heritable and polygenic. Molecular Psychiatry, 16(10), 996-1005.
  4. Shakeshaft, NG, et al. (2015). Generalist genes for cognition: A multivariate analysis of the NIHToolbox Cognitive Battery in a pediatric sample. Intelligence, 49, 31-43.
  5. Sniekers, S., et al. (2017). Genome-wide association meta-analysis of 78,308 individuals identifies new loci and genes influencing human intelligence. Nature Genetics, 49(7), 1107-1112.
  6. Okbay, A., et al. (2016). Genetic variants associated with subjective well-being, depressive symptoms, and neuroticism identified through genome-wide analyses. Nature Genetics, 48(6), 624-633.
  7. Dickinson, D., & Elvevåg, B. (2009). Genes, cognition and brain through a COMT lens. Neuroscience, 164(1), 72-87.
  8. Chiang, MC, et al. (2009). Genetics of brain fiber architecture and intellectual performance. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(7), 2212-2224.
  9. Tucker-Drob, EM, & Bates, TC (2016). Large cross-national differences in gene × socioeconomic status interaction on intelligence. Psychological Science, 27(2), 138-149.
  10. Turkheimer, E., et al. (2003). Socioeconomic status modifies heritability of IQ in young children. Psychological Science, 14(6), 623-628.
  11. Tesi, N., et al. (2019). Gene-based analyzes of cognitive traits and a pathway analysis of educational attainment. NPJ Science of Learning, 4(1), 1-9.
  12. Bohacek, J., & Mansuy, IM (2015). Molecular insights into transgenerational non-genetic inheritance of acquired behaviours. Nature Reviews Genetics, 16(11), 641-652.
  13. Haworth, CM, et al. (2010). The heritability of general cognitive ability increases linearly from childhood to young adulthood. Molecular Psychiatry, 15(11), 1112-1120.
  14. Polderman, TJ, et al. (2015). Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies. Nature Genetics, 47(7), 702-709.
  15. Plomin, R., et al. (2013). Behavioral Genetics (6th ed.). Worth Publishers.
  16. Kendler, KS, et al. (2015). Observed cognitive performance and deviation from familial cognitive aptitude at age 16 years and ages 18 to 20 years as predictors of future schizophrenia: A 35-year longitudinal Swedish population study. JAMA Psychiatry, 72(9), 911-918.
  17. Scarr, S., & Weinberg, RA (1978). The influence of "family background" on intellectual attainment. American Sociological Review, 43(5), 674-692.
  18. van IJzendoorn, MH, & Juffer, F. (2005). Adoption is a successful natural intervention enhancing adopted children's IQ and school performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(6), 326-330.
  19. Bouchard, TJ, Jr., et al. (1990). Sources of human psychological differences: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart. Science, 250(4978), 223-228.
  20. Johnson, W., et al. (2007). Genetic and environmental structure of adjectives describing the domains of the Big Five model of personality: A nationwide US twin study. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(5), 1179-1188.
  21. Briley, DA, & Tucker-Drob, EM (2013). Explaining the increasing heritability of cognitive ability across development: A meta-analysis of longitudinal twin and adoption studies. Psychological Science, 24(9), 1704-1713.
  22. Asbury, K., & Plomin, R. (2013). G is for Genes: The Impact of Genetics on Education and AchievementWiley-Blackwell.
  23. Diamond, A., & Lee, K. (2011). Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4 to 12 years old. Science, 333(6045), 959-964.

← Previous article Next article →

Back to top

Return to the blog