Intelekto Teorijos - www.Kristalai.eu

Intelligence theories

Intelligence has long been a subject of research and fascination in psychology. It encompasses a range of cognitive abilities, including the ability to learn, reason, solve problems, and adapt to new situations. Over the years, several theories have been proposed to explain the nature of intelligence and its various components. This article examines three major theories: Spearman's g-factor, Sternberg's Triarchic Theory, and the Cattell-Horn-Carroll Theory, each of which provides a unique perspective on understanding human intelligence.

Spearman's g-factor: A Concept of General Intelligence

Introduction to General Intelligence

In the early 20th century, British psychologist Charles Spearman introduced the concept of a general intelligence factor, known as the g-factor. Spearman observed that individuals who performed well on one cognitive test often performed well on others, suggesting a common underlying factor influencing all intellectual activities.

Spearman's Two-Factor Theory

Spearman's theory states that intelligence consists of two factors:

  • General Intelligence (g-factor): A broad mental ability that influences performance across all cognitive tasks. It is the innate ability to think logically, solve problems, and learn.
  • Specific Abilities (s-factors): These are abilities that are specific to certain tasks. While the g-factor affects general performance, the s-factors are responsible for differences in abilities across domains.

Evidence for the g-factor

Spearman used factor analysis, a statistical method, to examine correlations between various mental ability tests. He found that a single factor could explain the positive correlations between different cognitive tasks, confirming the existence of general intelligence.

Spearman's Theory of Influence

  • Educational Assessment: The g-factor has influenced the development of standardized intelligence tests, such as the IQ test, which aim to measure general cognitive ability.
  • Predicted Validity: General intelligence is a strong predictor of academic achievement, job performance, and other life outcomes.

Criticism of the g-factor

  • Oversimplification: Critics argue that reducing intelligence to a single factor overlooks the complexity and diversity of human abilities.
  • Cultural Bias: Standardized tests based on the g-factor may be biased towards certain cultures or socioeconomic groups.

Sternberg's Triarchic Theory: Analytical, Creative, and Practical Intelligence

Introduction to Triarchic Theory

In contrast to the unambiguous concept of intelligence, psychologist Robert J. Sternberg proposed the Triarchic Theory of Intelligence, which divides intelligence into three interrelated components: analytical, creative, and practical intelligence.

Definition of Three Components

  • Analytical Intelligence: Also known as component intelligence, it includes problem-solving skills, logical thinking, and information analysis. It is the intelligence most commonly measured by traditional IQ tests.
  • Creative Intelligence: Also called experiential intelligence, it involves the ability to deal with new situations using past experiences and current skills. It includes imagination, innovation, and the ability to generate new ideas.
  • Practical Intelligence: Known as contextual intelligence, it is related to the ability to adapt to a changing environment, solve real-world problems, and navigate everyday tasks.This includes street tricks and common sense.

Application of Triarchic Theory

  • Educational Practices: Sternberg's theory suggests that education should encompass all three types of intelligence in order to achieve a more holistic development of students.
  • Evaluation Methods: Including creative and practical tasks in assessments can provide a more comprehensive assessment of a person's abilities.

Research Support

Research has shown that assessments based on the Triarchic Theory can predict academic and real-world success more effectively than traditional IQ tests. For example, the inclusion of creative and practical components in admissions tests has improved predictions of college performance.

Criticism of the Triarchic Theory

  • Measurement Challenges: Accurately assessing creative and practical intelligence can be difficult due to the subjective nature of these constructs.
  • Compatibility with Other Theories: Some critics argue that Sternberg's components oversimplify existing concepts of intelligence and do not represent completely separate categories.

Cattell-Horn-Carroll Theory: Fluid and Crystallized Intelligence

Introduction to Fluid and Crystallized Intelligence

Psychologists Raymond B. Cattell and his student John L. Horn expanded on Spearman's work by proposing that general intelligence consists of two main factors: fluid intelligence (Gf) and crystallized intelligence (Gc).¹⁵ Later, John B. Carroll integrated their model with his three-dimensional theory, creating the Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) Theory, a comprehensive framework for understanding cognitive abilities.

Fluid Intelligence (Gf)

  • Definition: Fluid intelligence refers to the ability to think logically and solve new problems independently of previously acquired knowledge. It includes the ability to recognize patterns, think logically, and solve problems in new situations.
  • Features:
    • It reaches its peak in adolescence and decreases with aging.
    • Related to working memory and processing speed.
  • Examples:
    • Solve a puzzle without prior knowledge.
    • Recognize patterns in the following.

Crystallized Intelligence (Gc)

  • Definition: Crystallized intelligence involves knowledge and skills acquired through experience and education. It is the ability to use learned knowledge and past experiences to solve problems.
  • Features:
    • Increases with age as individuals accumulate more knowledge.
    • Depends on long-term memory.
  • Examples:
    • Vocabulary and language comprehension.
    • Knowledge of historical events.

Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) Theory

  • Integration: Carroll's three-dimensional model, which includes a general intelligence factor at the top, broad abilities in the middle, and narrow abilities at the bottom, was combined with the Cattell-Horn Gf-Gc model, creating the CHC Theory.
  • Structure:
    • Stratum III: General intelligence (g-factor).
    • Stratum II: A broad range of abilities, including fluid and crystallized intelligence, as well as others such as processing speed and spatial thinking skills.
    • Stratum I: Narrow abilities, specific skills within broad categories.

Application of CHC Theory

  • Psychometric Testing: The CHC model is widely used in the development of cognitive ability assessments, such as the Woodcock-Johnson Cognitive Ability Tests.
  • Educational Interventions: Understanding different cognitive abilities can help tailor educational programs to individual student needs.

Research Support

Research supports the distinction between fluid and crystallized intelligence, providing evidence that each has different developmental trajectories and neural correlates for each. Neuroimaging studies have identified distinct brain regions associated with Gf and Gc.

Criticism of the CHC Theory

  • Complexity: The complexity of the model may make it difficult to apply it in practical situations²¹.
  • The g-factor debate: Some researchers argue against the existence of a single general intelligence factor, arguing that intelligence is too multifaceted to be described by a single construct²².

Theories of intelligence have evolved significantly over the past century, moving from Spearman's straightforward g-factor to more nuanced models such as Sternberg's Triarchic Theory and Cattell-Horn-Carroll Theory. These theories emphasize different aspects of intelligence, from general cognitive abilities to specific skills such as creative and practical problem solving, and the distinction between fluid thinking and accumulated knowledge.

Understanding these theories provides valuable insights into human cognition that have practical implications for education, psychological assessment, and personal development. By recognizing the multifaceted nature of intelligence, we can create a more personalized approach to learning and recognize the diverse strengths that individuals possess.

Literature

  1. Spearman, C. (1904). "General Intelligence," Objectively Determined and Measured. The American Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 201–292.
  2. Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g Factor: The Science of Mental Ability. Praeger.
  3. Deary, IJ (2012). Intelligence. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 453–482.
  4. Gottfredson, LS (1997). Why g Matters: The Complexity of Everyday Life. Intelligence, 24(1), 79–132.
  5. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Basic Books.
  6. Helms, JE (1992). Why is there no study of cultural equivalence in standardized cognitive ability testing? American Psychologist, 47(9), 1083–1101.
  7. Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A Triarchic Theory of Human IntelligenceCambridge University Press.
  8. Sternberg, RJ, & Lubart, TI (1995). Defying the Crowd: Cultivating Creativity in a Culture of Conformity.Free Press.
  9. Sternberg, RJ, Wagner, RK, & Okagaki, L. (1993). Practical Intelligence: The Nature and Role of Tacit Knowledge at Work and at School. In Everyday Intelligence (pp. 205–227). Springer.
  10. Sternberg, RJ, & The Rainbow Project Collaborators. (2006). The Rainbow Project: Enhancing the SAT through assessments of analytical, practical, and creative skills. Intelligence, 34(4), 321–350.
  11. Brody, N. (2003). Construct validation of the Sternberg Triarchic Abilities Test: Comment and reanalysis. Intelligence, 31(4), 319–329.
  12. Messick, S. (1992).Multiple intelligences or multilevel intelligence? Selective emphasis on distinctive properties of hierarchy: On Gardner's Frames of Mind and Sternberg's Beyond IQ in the context of theory and research on the structure of human abilities. Psychological Inquiry, 3(4), 365–384.
  13. Cattell, RB (1963). Theory of Fluid and Crystallized Intelligence: A Critical Experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54(1), 1–22.
  14. McGrew, KS (2009). CHC Theory and the Human Cognitive Abilities Project: Standing on the Shoulders of the Giants of Psychometric Intelligence Research. Intelligence, 37(1), 1–10.
  15. Horn, JL, & Cattell, RB (1967). Age Differences in Fluid and Crystallized Intelligence. Acta Psychologica, 26, 107–129.
  16. Woodcock, RW, McGrew, KS, & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Abilities. Riverside Publishing.
  17. Flanagan, DP, & Dixon, SG (2014). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll Theory of Cognitive Abilities. In DP Flanagan & PL Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Tests, and Issues (3rd ed., pp. 23–56). The Guilford Press.
  18. Gray, JR, Chabris, CF, & Braver, TS (2003). Neural Mechanisms of General Fluid Intelligence. Nature Neuroscience, 6(3), 316–322.
  19. Keith, TZ, & Reynolds, MR (2010). Cattell-Horn-Carroll Abilities and Cognitive Tests: What We've Learned from 20 Years of Research. Psychology in Schools, 47(7), 635–650.

    ← Previous article Next article →

    Back to top

    Return to the blog