Sporto Įrangos Dizaino Pasiekimai - www.Kristalai.eu

Achievement of Sports Equipment Design

Equipment design has evolved from basic functionality to the integration of sophisticated technology and ergonomic principles. Modern equipment is designed not only to perform its intended function, but also to interact seamlessly with the human body, improving comfort, efficiency and safety.

Technological Innovations

  • Materials Science: Advances in materials such as carbon fiber, advanced polymers, and smart textiles have allowed for the creation of lighter, stronger, and more durable equipment.
  • Digital Integration: The integration of sensors, microprocessors, and communication functions allows the equipment to provide real-time feedback and data analysis.
  • Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing): Allows for complex designs and rapid prototyping, providing the ability to customize and innovate equipment shapes and structures.

Ergonomic and Biomechanical Considerations

  • Human Centered Design: Focuses on aligning equipment design with human anatomy and movement patterns.
  • Biomechanical Research: Comprehensive research into human movement informs equipment design, optimizing performance and reducing strain.
  • Security Improvements: Features are implemented that minimize the risk of injuries during use.

Biomechanically Efficient Machines: Reducing Injury Risk

The Importance of Biomechanics in Equipment Design

Biomechanics is the study of mechanical laws related to the movement or structure of living organisms. In the field of equipment design, biomechanics plays an important role in understanding how forces interact with the human body when using equipment.

  • Motion Optimization: Equipment that complements the body's natural movements reduces unnecessary strain on muscles and joints.
  • Power Distribution: Proper equipment design ensures that forces are evenly distributed, minimizing pressure points and potential injuries.
  • Injury Prevention: By understanding the biomechanics of injuries, designers can create equipment that reduces the most common risk factors.

Examples of Biomechanically Efficient Machines

Fitness Equipment

  • Elliptical Trainers: Designed to mimic the natural path of the ankle, knee and hip joints while walking or running, reducing joint strain.
  • Adjustable Ergonomic Swallowing Trainers: Featuring dynamic resistance and adjustable components to accommodate different body sizes and reduce lower back strain.

Industrial Tools

  • Ergonomic Hand Tools: Designed with handle sections that reduce wrist deflection and require less seating force, reducing the risk of repetitive strain injuries.
  • Exoskeleton: Wearable devices that support and enhance human movements, reducing muscle fatigue and the risk of injury in manual work.

Medical and Rehabilitation Equipment

  • Robotic Rehabilitation Devices: Helps patients' movements with precise control, aiding recovery and preventing overexertion.
  • Biomechanically Aligned Prostheses: Artificial limbs are created to mimic natural gait patterns, reducing compensatory injuries.

Injury Risk Reduction Effect

Biomechanically efficient machines contribute significantly to injury prevention:

  • Reduces Joint Stress: Reduces shock and unnatural movements that can cause wear and tear.
  • Improves Muscle Activation: Promotes balanced muscle use to prevent overcompensation and muscle imbalance.
  • Improves Posture and Coordination: Promotes proper body alignment when using equipment, reducing stress on the spine and other critical areas.

Customizable Equipment: Adaptable to Individual Needs

Adaptation Need for Equipment

Individuals vary in body size, strength, flexibility, and specific needs. Adaptive equipment accommodates these differences by offering customization that results in:

  • Improved Comfort: Adjustments ensure that the equipment fits the user's body, improving comfort and ease of use.
  • Improved Performance: Customization allows users to optimize equipment settings for their specific goals.
  • Inclusivity: Adaptive equipment can accommodate users with disabilities or special requirements.

Technologies That Enable Adaptability

Adjustable Components

  • Mechanical Adjustments: Simple mechanisms such as adjustable seats, handles and supports.
  • Dynamic Resistance Systems: Equipment that automatically adjusts resistance based on user input or performance metrics.

Smart Technology Integration

  • Sensor Feedback: Devices with sensors that monitor user performance and adjust settings in real time.
  • User Profiles and AI: A device that stores user preferences and uses artificial intelligence to suggest optimal settings.

Modular Design

  • Replacement Parts: Components that can be changed to suit different exercises or user preferences.
  • Measured Systems: Equipment that can be expanded or modified as the user's needs change.

Examples of Adaptable Equipment

Fitness and Sports

  • Adjustable Dumbbells and Weight Systems: Allows users to easily change weight units, saving space and accommodating different strength levels.
  • Smart Running Guides and Bikes: Offers customizable workouts, automatically adjusts elevation/resistance, and adapts to the user's speed.
  • Personalized Athletic Shoes: Footwear that adapts to individual foot shape and stride patterns, improving performance and reducing the risk of injury.

Workplace Equipment

  • Ergonomic Office Chairs and Desks: Adjustable height, movable support and tilt functions to suit individual ergonomics.
  • Adaptive Computer Peripherals: Keyboards and mice designed to accommodate different hand sizes and reduce strain.

Rehabilitation and Medical Equipment

  • Adjustable Wheels: Adaptable seats, supports and control systems to meet individual mobility needs.
  • Personalized Orthotic Devices: Splints and supports tailored to individual anatomy and therapeutic requirements.

Advantages of Adaptive Equipment

  • Improved Security: Proper fit reduces the risk of accidents and injuries.
  • Increased Accessibility: Meets a wider range of users, including those with special needs.
  • User Satisfaction: Personalization leads to greater satisfaction and adherence to use.

Future Trends in Equipment Design

Advanced Technology Integration

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI): AI-powered devices that learn from user behavior provide personalized experiences.
  • Virtual and Augmented Reality (VR/AR): Improving exercise bikes and rehabilitation by simulating environments and providing interactive feedback.
  • Internet of Things (IoT): Connecting devices to networks for data sharing, remote monitoring, and enhanced functionality.

Sustainable and Eco-friendly Designs

  • Recyclable Materials: Materials used are environmentally friendly and sustainable.
  • Energy Efficiency: Equipment that produces or saves energy during use.

Focus on Inclusive Design

  • Universal Design Principles: To create equipment that is accessible and usable by all people, regardless of age, ability, or lifestyle.
  • Collaborative Design Processes: Involve end users in the design process to better meet their needs.

Advances in equipment design, particularly the development of biomechanically efficient machines and adaptive equipment, have significantly contributed to increasing safety, performance, and user satisfaction. By aligning equipment with natural movements and the diverse needs of individuals, designers and manufacturers are reducing the risk of injury and making equipment more accessible. The continued integration of technology, a focus on sustainability, and a commitment to inclusive design promise an exciting future for equipment innovation across a variety of fields.

This article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered professional advice. Always consult qualified professionals when selecting or using specialized equipment.

Links

  • Gibson, I., Rosen, DW, & Stucker, B. (2015). Additive Manufacturing Technologies: 3D Printing, Rapid Prototyping, and Direct Digital Manufacturing (2nd ed.). Springer.
  • He, J., Bai, S., Periaswamy, S., et al. (2017). Big data and industrial internet of things for the aviation industry in the open source ecosystem. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 13(4), 1873–1882.
  • Campbell, T., Williams, C., Ivanova, O., & Garrett, B. (2011). Could 3D printing change the world? Technologies, potential, and implications of additive manufacturing. Atlantic Council, 3–4.
  • Nigg, BM, & Herzog, W. (2007). Biomechanics of the Musculo-skeletal System (3rd ed.). Wiley.
  • Solomonow, M. (2012). Neuromuscular manifestations of viscoelastic tissue degradation following high and low risk repetitive lumbar flexion. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 22(2), 155–175.
  • Kumar, S. (2001). Theories of musculoskeletal injury causation. Ergonomics, 44(1), 17–47.
  • Grabowski, AM, & Kram, R. (2008). Effects of velocity and weight support on ground reaction forces and metabolic power during running. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 24(3), 288–297.
  • Hagerman, F. C. (1984). Applied physiology of rowing. Sports Medicine, 1(4), 303–326.
  • Douwes, M., de Kraker, H., & Hoozemans, MJM (2001). Mechanical exposures of the wrist during car driving and implications for left-handed drivers. Applied Ergonomics, 32(4), 359–368.
  • de Looze, MP, Bosch, T., Krause, F., et al. (2016). Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load. Ergonomics, 59(5), 671–681.
  • Mehrholz, J., Thomas, S., Werner, C., et al. (2017). Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (5), CD006185.
  • Major, MJ, & Twiste, M. (2019). Gait of lower-limb amputees: Review of three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic studies. Gait & Posture, 70, 1–6.
  • Messier, SP, Legault, C., Loeser, RF, et al. (2013). Does high weight loss in older adults with knee osteoarthritis affect bone-on-bone joint loads and muscle forces during walking? Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 19(3), 272–280.
  • Page, P. (2012). Current concepts in muscle stretching for exercise and rehabilitation. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 7(1), 109–119.
  • McGill, S. M. (2007). Low Back Disorders: Evidence-Based Prevention and Rehabilitation (2nd ed.). Human Kinetics.
  • Zemp, R., List, R., Gülay, T., et al. (2016). Soft tissue artifacts of the human back: Comparison of the motion of the skin markers with the underlying vertebral bodies during trunk extension exercises. Journal of Biomechanics, 49(14), 3158–3164.
  • Fleck, SJ, & Kraemer, WJ (2014). Designing Resistance Training Programs (4th ed.). Human Kinetics.
  • Story, MF, Mueller, JL, & Mace, RL (1998). The Universal Design File: Designing for People of All Ages and Abilities. North Carolina State University, The Center for Universal Design.
  • Feeney, DF, Stanhope, SJ, Kaminski, TR, & Higginson, JS (2018). Machine learning for automatic tuning of virtual reality treadmill speed to individual walking characteristics. Journal of Biomechanics, 67, 91–96.
  • Seiberl, W., Power, GA, & Herzog, W. (2015). The stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) revisited: Residual force enhancement contributes to increased performance during fast stretch-shortening cycles. Journal of Experimental Biology, 218(Pt 16), 2856–2863.
  • Zhang, Z., Chen, Y., & Li, M. (2018). An intelligent power assist robot control using adaptive impedance and reinforcement learning. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 65(4), 3411–3420.
  • Tsai, Y. J., & Lin, S. I. (2013). The effects of walking sticks and canes on gait stability in older adults. Journal of Biomechanics, 46(9), 1472–1477.
  • Andersen, LL, Andersen, JL, Magnusson, SP, et al. (2005). Neuromuscular adaptations to detraining following resistance training in previously untrained subjects. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 93(5-6), 511–518.
  • Weng, CM, Lee, CL, & Chen, CH (2017). The effects of a 12-week Pilates course on running economy, muscle strength, and flexibility in male distance runners. Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness, 15(3), 97–103.
  • Cheung, R.T.H., & Ng, G.Y.F. (2007). Motion control shoe reduces pain in runners with plantar fasciitis. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 35(3), 470–476.
  • Robertson, MM, Ciriello, VM, & Garabet, AM (2013). Office ergonomics training and a sit-stand workstation: Effects on musculoskeletal and visual symptoms and performance of office workers. Applied Ergonomics, 44(1), 73–85.
  • Gustafsson, E., Johnson, PW, & Hagberg, M. (2010). Thumb postures and physical loads during mobile phone use – a comparison of young adults with and without musculoskeletal symptoms. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 20(1), 127–135.
  • Ding, D., Leister, E., Cooper, RA, et al. (2008). Usage of tilt-in-space, recline, and elevating legs. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89(7), 1330–1336.
  • Schrank, ES, & Stanhope, SJ (2011). Dimensional accuracy of ankle-foot orthoses constructed by rapid customization and manufacturing framework. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 48(1), 31–42.
  • Gallagher, KM, & Callaghan, JP (2015). Early static standing is associated with prolonged standing induced low back pain. Human Movement Science, 44, 111–121.
  • Thompson, W. R. (2018). Worldwide survey of fitness trends for 2019. ACSM's Health & Fitness Journal, 22(6), 10–17.
  • Regterschot, GR, Folkersma, M., Zhang, W., et al. (2014). Effects and feasibility of exergaming in people with Parkinson's disease: A pilot study. Physical Therapy, 94(7), 1055–1068.
  • Li, S., Xu, LD, & Zhao, S. (2015). The internet of things: A survey. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(2), 243–259.
  • Greene, DL, & Lewis, C. (2011). Sustainability and material selection: How life cycle analysis can be used to facilitate sustainable materials selection. Journal of Mechanical Design, 133(10), 101002.
  • Steinfeld, E., Maisel, JL, & Steinfeld, E. (2012). Universal Design: Creating Inclusive Environments. Wiley.

← Previous article Next article →

Back to top

Return to the blog